Download our SSCE Study Guide Bundle
How does the cyclical ending contribute to meaning in An Inspector Calls by J. B. Priestley?
The cyclical ending of An Inspector Calls contributes to the play’s meaning by reinforcing the themes of inescapable moral responsibility, the consequences of refusing to learn, and the potential for a “time loop” grounded in J.B. Priestley’s interest in theories of time.
The play is structured as a moral test. Inspector Goole arrives to warn the family. He dissects their actions and offers them a chance to accept their guilt. When Goole leaves, the “real” world—represented by the phone call to the Infirmary—reveals that no girl has died yet. This creates a vacuum, a moment of relief where the characters believe they have escaped a “public scandal.”
This interval tests whether their remorse was genuine or merely fear of exposure. Mr. and Mrs. Birling and Gerald immediately revert to their old callousness. They dismiss the evening as a “hoax” and a “joke.”
Consequently, because the older generation refuses to learn the lesson voluntarily through the “spiritual” inquiry of Goole, they are forced to face the lesson again through the “real” inquiry of the police. The ending implies that they are doomed to repeat the cycle of interrogation and guilt until they truly accept their responsibility.
The cyclical ending also confirms that Inspector Goole was not a standard police officer, but a supernatural agent or a manifestation of the collective conscience. Goole warns them that if men do not learn the lesson that “we are members of one body,” they will be taught it in “fire and blood and anguish”. The final telephone call that announces that a girl has just died and an inspector is on his way fulfills this warning. It suggests that the events of the play were a premonition or a “second chance” that the family squandered. The “real” inspector represents the inevitability of truth; reality has caught up with them because they refused to change their hearts.
Notably, the ending crystallises the difference between the generations. The younger generation represented by Sheila and Eric accept the meaning of the cycle before it restarts. Sheila is frightened by her parents’ ability to pretend “nothing much has happened.” She understands that whether the inspector was a specific police officer or not, everything they said had happened really had happened. They have broken the cycle by learning the lesson. However, Arthur and Sybil Birling only care about the status of the inspector. When they think he is a fake, they feel safe. The final phone call shatters this complacency, punishing them specifically for their arrogance and refusal to acknowledge the reality of their actions.
It is also worth noting that Priestley was influenced by P.D. Ouspensky’s theory of eternal recurrence, which suggests that we live our lives over and over again until we make different choices to break the cycle. The play ends exactly where it began: with the announcement of a suicide and the arrival of an inspector. This structure implies that the Birlings are trapped in a time loop (a hell of their own making) and will be forced to relive the tragedy of Eva Smith endlessly until they stop acting as individuals and start behaving as a community.
Receive Literary Updates through our Social Media Channels:
- WhatsApp: Literature PADI
- Telegram: Literature PADI
- YouTube: @literaturepadi
- Facebook: Literature PADI
